Activepieces vs n8n

Activepieces

Open-source no-code automation for business

n8n

Fair-code workflow automation with 400+ integrations

Feature Activepieces n8n
Category Automation Automation
Sub-category Workflow Workflow
Maturity stable stable
Complexity intermediate intermediate
Performance tier medium medium
License MIT Sustainable Use
License type permissive fair-code
Pricing fully free fully free
GitHub stars 12.0K 55.0K
Contributors 0 0
Commit frequency weekly weekly
Plugin ecosystem none none
Docs quality good good
Backing org Activepieces n8n GmbH
Funding model vc_backed vc_backed
Min RAM 512 MB 512 MB
Min CPU cores 1 1
Scaling pattern single_node single_node
Self-hostable Yes Yes
K8s native No No
Offline capable No No
Vendor lock-in none none
Languages TypeScript TypeScript
API type REST REST
Protocols HTTP HTTP
Deployment docker, npm docker, npm
SDK languages
Team size fit solo, small, medium, enterprise solo, small, medium, enterprise
First release 2020 2020
Latest version

When to use Activepieces

  • Primary: business-automation
  • Primary: app-integration
  • Primary: no-code-workflow

When to use n8n

  • Primary: api-integration
  • Primary: business-process-automation
  • Primary: ai-workflow-building

Activepieces anti-patterns

  • Fewer connectors than n8n
  • Less technical flexibility
  • Smaller community

n8n anti-patterns

  • Fair-code license restricts some commercial use
  • Complex workflows can be hard to debug
  • Self-hosting needs maintenance
Full Activepieces profile → Full n8n profile → All comparisons