Activepieces vs n8n

Activepieces

Open-source no-code automation for business

n8n

Fair-code workflow automation with 400+ integrations

Feature Activepieces n8n
Category Automation Automation
Sub-category Workflow Workflow
Maturity stable stable
Complexity intermediate intermediate
Performance tier medium medium
License MIT Sustainable Use
License type permissive fair-code
Pricing fully free fully free
GitHub stars 12.0K 55.0K
Contributors 0 0
Commit frequency weekly weekly
Plugin ecosystem none none
Docs quality good good
Backing org Activepieces n8n GmbH
Funding model vc_backed vc_backed
Min RAM 512 MB 512 MB
Min CPU cores 1 1
Scaling pattern single_node single_node
Self-hostable Yes Yes
K8s native No No
Offline capable No No
Vendor lock-in none none
Languages TypeScript TypeScript
API type REST REST
Protocols HTTP HTTP
Deployment docker, npm docker, npm
SDK languages — —
Team size fit solo, small, medium, enterprise solo, small, medium, enterprise
First release 2020 2020
Latest version — —

When to use Activepieces

  • ✓ Primary: business-automation
  • ✓ Primary: app-integration
  • ✓ Primary: no-code-workflow

When to use n8n

  • ✓ Primary: api-integration
  • ✓ Primary: business-process-automation
  • ✓ Primary: ai-workflow-building

Activepieces anti-patterns

  • ✕ Fewer connectors than n8n
  • ✕ Less technical flexibility
  • ✕ Smaller community

n8n anti-patterns

  • ✕ Fair-code license restricts some commercial use
  • ✕ Complex workflows can be hard to debug
  • ✕ Self-hosting needs maintenance
Full Activepieces profile → Full n8n profile → All comparisons