AdGuard Home vs Pi-hole

AdGuard Home

Network-wide ad and tracker blocking with DNS-over-HTTPS

Pi-hole

Network-level DNS ad and tracker blocker

Feature AdGuard Home Pi-hole
Category DNS & Networking DNS & Networking
Sub-category DNS Blocker DNS Blocker
Maturity stable stable
Complexity intermediate beginner
Performance tier medium medium
License GPL-3.0 EUPL
License type copyleft copyleft
Pricing fully free fully free
GitHub stars 27.0K 51.0K
Contributors 0 0
Commit frequency weekly weekly
Plugin ecosystem none none
Docs quality good good
Backing org AdGuard Pi-hole
Funding model corporate community
Min RAM 128 MB 256 MB
Min CPU cores 1 1
Scaling pattern single_node single_node
Self-hostable Yes Yes
K8s native No No
Offline capable No No
Vendor lock-in none none
Languages Go Shell, PHP
API type REST REST
Protocols HTTP HTTP
Deployment docker, binary docker, binary
SDK languages
Team size fit small, medium solo, small, medium, enterprise
First release 2020 2020
Latest version

When to use AdGuard Home

  • Encrypted DNS ad blocking with DoH/DoT
  • Per-device filtering rules
  • Parental controls for home network

When to use Pi-hole

  • Primary: network-ad-blocking
  • Primary: dns-filtering
  • Primary: privacy-protection

AdGuard Home anti-patterns

  • Less community filters than Pi-hole
  • Single binary — less extensible
  • Some advanced features need config files

Pi-hole anti-patterns

Full AdGuard Home profile → Full Pi-hole profile → All comparisons