AdGuard Home vs Pi-hole

AdGuard Home

Network-wide ad and tracker blocking with DNS-over-HTTPS

Pi-hole

Network-level DNS ad and tracker blocker

Feature AdGuard Home Pi-hole
Category DNS & Networking DNS & Networking
Sub-category DNS Blocker DNS Blocker
Maturity stable stable
Complexity intermediate beginner
Performance tier medium medium
License GPL-3.0 EUPL
License type copyleft copyleft
Pricing fully free fully free
GitHub stars 27.0K 51.0K
Contributors 0 0
Commit frequency weekly weekly
Plugin ecosystem none none
Docs quality good good
Backing org AdGuard Pi-hole
Funding model corporate community
Min RAM 128 MB 256 MB
Min CPU cores 1 1
Scaling pattern single_node single_node
Self-hostable Yes Yes
K8s native No No
Offline capable No No
Vendor lock-in none none
Languages Go Shell, PHP
API type REST REST
Protocols HTTP HTTP
Deployment docker, binary docker, binary
SDK languages — —
Team size fit small, medium solo, small, medium, enterprise
First release 2020 2020
Latest version — —

When to use AdGuard Home

  • ✓ Encrypted DNS ad blocking with DoH/DoT
  • ✓ Per-device filtering rules
  • ✓ Parental controls for home network

When to use Pi-hole

  • ✓ Primary: network-ad-blocking
  • ✓ Primary: dns-filtering
  • ✓ Primary: privacy-protection

AdGuard Home anti-patterns

  • ✕ Less community filters than Pi-hole
  • ✕ Single binary — less extensible
  • ✕ Some advanced features need config files

Pi-hole anti-patterns

Full AdGuard Home profile → Full Pi-hole profile → All comparisons