Appwrite vs PocketBase

Appwrite

Backend platform for web, mobile, and Flutter

PocketBase

Backend in a single file with admin UI

Feature Appwrite PocketBase
Category Low-Code Low-Code
Sub-category Backend-as-Service Backend-as-Service
Maturity stable stable
Complexity beginner beginner
Performance tier medium medium
License BSD-3-Clause MIT
License type permissive permissive
Pricing fully free fully free
GitHub stars 48.0K 44.0K
Contributors 0 0
Commit frequency weekly weekly
Plugin ecosystem none none
Docs quality good good
Backing org Appwrite PocketBase
Funding model vc_backed community
Min RAM 1 GB 128 MB
Min CPU cores 1 1
Scaling pattern single_node single_node
Self-hostable Yes Yes
K8s native No No
Offline capable No No
Vendor lock-in none none
Languages TypeScript Go
API type REST REST
Protocols HTTP HTTP
Deployment docker docker
SDK languages — —
Team size fit solo, small, medium solo, small, medium
First release 2020 2020
Latest version — —

When to use Appwrite

  • ✓ Primary: backend-as-service
  • ✓ Primary: authentication
  • ✓ Primary: file-storage

When to use PocketBase

  • ✓ Primary: rapid-prototyping-backend
  • ✓ Primary: small-app-backend
  • ✓ Primary: auth-and-storage

Appwrite anti-patterns

  • ✕ Self-hosting needs multiple containers
  • ✕ Less mature than Firebase
  • ✕ Smaller extension ecosystem

PocketBase anti-patterns

  • ✕ SQLite limits concurrent writes
  • ✕ Not for large-scale production
  • ✕ Single-binary means single-node
Full Appwrite profile → Full PocketBase profile → All comparisons