Appwrite vs PocketBase

Appwrite

Backend platform for web, mobile, and Flutter

PocketBase

Backend in a single file with admin UI

Feature Appwrite PocketBase
Category Low-Code Low-Code
Sub-category Backend-as-Service Backend-as-Service
Maturity stable stable
Complexity beginner beginner
Performance tier medium medium
License BSD-3-Clause MIT
License type permissive permissive
Pricing fully free fully free
GitHub stars 48.0K 44.0K
Contributors 0 0
Commit frequency weekly weekly
Plugin ecosystem none none
Docs quality good good
Backing org Appwrite PocketBase
Funding model vc_backed community
Min RAM 1 GB 128 MB
Min CPU cores 1 1
Scaling pattern single_node single_node
Self-hostable Yes Yes
K8s native No No
Offline capable No No
Vendor lock-in none none
Languages TypeScript Go
API type REST REST
Protocols HTTP HTTP
Deployment docker docker
SDK languages
Team size fit solo, small, medium solo, small, medium
First release 2020 2020
Latest version

When to use Appwrite

  • Primary: backend-as-service
  • Primary: authentication
  • Primary: file-storage

When to use PocketBase

  • Primary: rapid-prototyping-backend
  • Primary: small-app-backend
  • Primary: auth-and-storage

Appwrite anti-patterns

  • Self-hosting needs multiple containers
  • Less mature than Firebase
  • Smaller extension ecosystem

PocketBase anti-patterns

  • SQLite limits concurrent writes
  • Not for large-scale production
  • Single-binary means single-node
Full Appwrite profile → Full PocketBase profile → All comparisons