Appwrite vs Supabase

Appwrite

Backend platform for web, mobile, and Flutter

Supabase

Open-source Firebase alternative on PostgreSQL

Feature Appwrite Supabase
Category Low-Code Low-Code
Sub-category Backend-as-Service Backend-as-Service
Maturity stable stable
Complexity beginner beginner
Performance tier medium medium
License BSD-3-Clause Apache-2.0
License type permissive permissive
Pricing fully free fully free
GitHub stars 48.0K 78.0K
Contributors 0 0
Commit frequency weekly weekly
Plugin ecosystem none none
Docs quality good good
Backing org Appwrite Supabase
Funding model vc_backed vc_backed
Min RAM 1 GB 1 GB
Min CPU cores 1 1
Scaling pattern single_node single_node
Self-hostable Yes Yes
K8s native No No
Offline capable No No
Vendor lock-in none none
Languages TypeScript TypeScript
API type REST REST
Protocols HTTP HTTP
Deployment docker docker
SDK languages — —
Team size fit solo, small, medium solo, small, medium
First release 2020 2020
Latest version — —

When to use Appwrite

  • ✓ Primary: backend-as-service
  • ✓ Primary: authentication
  • ✓ Primary: file-storage

When to use Supabase

  • ✓ Primary: backend-as-service
  • ✓ Primary: authentication
  • ✓ Primary: realtime-subscriptions

Appwrite anti-patterns

  • ✕ Self-hosting needs multiple containers
  • ✕ Less mature than Firebase
  • ✕ Smaller extension ecosystem

Supabase anti-patterns

  • ✕ PostgreSQL dependency
  • ✕ Edge functions limited vs full serverless
  • ✕ Self-hosting complex
Full Appwrite profile → Full Supabase profile → All comparisons