Appwrite vs Supabase

Appwrite

Backend platform for web, mobile, and Flutter

Supabase

Open-source Firebase alternative on PostgreSQL

Feature Appwrite Supabase
Category Low-Code Low-Code
Sub-category Backend-as-Service Backend-as-Service
Maturity stable stable
Complexity beginner beginner
Performance tier medium medium
License BSD-3-Clause Apache-2.0
License type permissive permissive
Pricing fully free fully free
GitHub stars 48.0K 78.0K
Contributors 0 0
Commit frequency weekly weekly
Plugin ecosystem none none
Docs quality good good
Backing org Appwrite Supabase
Funding model vc_backed vc_backed
Min RAM 1 GB 1 GB
Min CPU cores 1 1
Scaling pattern single_node single_node
Self-hostable Yes Yes
K8s native No No
Offline capable No No
Vendor lock-in none none
Languages TypeScript TypeScript
API type REST REST
Protocols HTTP HTTP
Deployment docker docker
SDK languages
Team size fit solo, small, medium solo, small, medium
First release 2020 2020
Latest version

When to use Appwrite

  • Primary: backend-as-service
  • Primary: authentication
  • Primary: file-storage

When to use Supabase

  • Primary: backend-as-service
  • Primary: authentication
  • Primary: realtime-subscriptions

Appwrite anti-patterns

  • Self-hosting needs multiple containers
  • Less mature than Firebase
  • Smaller extension ecosystem

Supabase anti-patterns

  • PostgreSQL dependency
  • Edge functions limited vs full serverless
  • Self-hosting complex
Full Appwrite profile → Full Supabase profile → All comparisons