Cachet vs Uptime Kuma

Cachet

Open-source status page system

Uptime Kuma

Self-hosted uptime monitoring with beautiful UI

Feature Cachet Uptime Kuma
Category Monitoring Monitoring
Sub-category Status Page Uptime
Maturity stable mature
Complexity intermediate intermediate
Performance tier medium medium
License BSD-3-Clause MIT
License type permissive permissive
Pricing fully free fully free
GitHub stars 14.0K 65.0K
Contributors 100 300
Commit frequency weekly weekly
Plugin ecosystem none none
Docs quality good good
Backing org Cachet Community
Funding model community community
Min RAM 256 MB 256 MB
Min CPU cores 1 1
Scaling pattern single_node single_node
Self-hostable Yes Yes
K8s native Yes Yes
Offline capable No No
Vendor lock-in none none
Languages PHP Node.js
API type REST REST
Protocols HTTP HTTP
Deployment docker docker, binary
SDK languages
Team size fit small, medium, enterprise small, medium, enterprise
First release 2020 2020
Latest version

When to use Cachet

  • Primary: public-status-page
  • Primary: incident-communication
  • Primary: component-monitoring

When to use Uptime Kuma

  • Primary: website-monitoring
  • Primary: ssl-certificate-monitoring
  • Primary: service-health-checks

Cachet anti-patterns

  • Development has slowed
  • PHP-based — less modern stack
  • Limited built-in monitoring — needs external checks

Uptime Kuma anti-patterns

  • Single-node only
  • Not for APM or tracing
  • Limited for large-scale monitoring
Full Cachet profile → Full Uptime Kuma profile → All comparisons