CockroachDB vs PostgreSQL

CockroachDB

Distributed SQL for global cloud-native applications

PostgreSQL

The world's most advanced open-source relational database

Feature CockroachDB PostgreSQL
Category Databases Databases
Sub-category Distributed SQL Relational
Maturity stable mature
Complexity advanced intermediate
Performance tier medium enterprise grade
License BSL PostgreSQL
License type source-available permissive
Pricing fully free fully free
GitHub stars 30.0K 0
Contributors 500 1.5K
Commit frequency weekly daily
Plugin ecosystem none massive
Docs quality good excellent
Backing org Cockroach Labs PostgreSQL Global Dev Group
Funding model vc_backed community
Min RAM 2 GB 256 MB
Min CPU cores 2 1
Scaling pattern distributed vertical
Self-hostable Yes Yes
K8s native No No
Offline capable Yes Yes
Vendor lock-in none none
Languages Go C
API type REST SDK
Protocols HTTP PostgreSQL wire
Deployment docker, apt, binary apt, docker, binary
SDK languages — python, javascript, java, go, rust, ruby, c, php, c#
Team size fit solo, small, medium, enterprise solo, small, medium, enterprise
First release 2020 1996
Latest version — —

When to use CockroachDB

  • ✓ Primary use: global-applications
  • ✓ Primary use: multi-region-deployment
  • ✓ Primary use: strong-consistency

When to use PostgreSQL

  • ✓ Primary transactional database for web applications
  • ✓ GIS applications with PostGIS extension
  • ✓ Time-series data with TimescaleDB extension
  • ✓ Vector similarity search with pgvector for RAG
  • ✓ JSONB document storage as MongoDB alternative

CockroachDB anti-patterns

PostgreSQL anti-patterns

  • ✕ Horizontal sharding not native (need Citus)
  • ✕ Not ideal for pure key-value workloads at massive scale
  • ✕ Write-heavy append-only workloads better served by Cassandra
  • ✕ Not a graph database
Full CockroachDB profile → Full PostgreSQL profile → All comparisons