Gitea vs Woodpecker CI
Gitea
Lightweight self-hosted Git service
Woodpecker CI
Community fork of Drone CI for container-native builds
| Feature | Gitea | Woodpecker CI |
|---|---|---|
| Category | DevOps & Infra | DevOps & Infra |
| Sub-category | CI/CD | CI/CD |
| Maturity | stable | stable |
| Complexity | beginner | intermediate |
| Performance tier | medium | medium |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| License type | permissive | permissive |
| Pricing | fully free | fully free |
| GitHub stars | 47.0K | 5.0K |
| Contributors | 800 | 100 |
| Commit frequency | weekly | weekly |
| Plugin ecosystem | none | none |
| Docs quality | good | good |
| Backing org | Gitea Community | Woodpecker |
| Funding model | community | community |
| Min RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Min CPU cores | 1 | 1 |
| Scaling pattern | single_node | horizontal |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| K8s native | No | No |
| Offline capable | No | No |
| Vendor lock-in | none | none |
| Languages | Go | Go |
| API type | REST | REST |
| Protocols | HTTP | HTTP |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, binary |
| SDK languages | — | — |
| Team size fit | solo, small, medium | small, medium |
| First release | 2020 | 2020 |
| Latest version | — | — |
When to use Gitea
- ✓ Primary: lightweight-git-hosting
- ✓ Primary: code-review
- ✓ Primary: ci-cd
When to use Woodpecker CI
- ✓ Primary: container-native-ci
- ✓ Primary: multi-platform-builds
- ✓ Primary: lightweight-ci-cd
Gitea anti-patterns
- ✕ Smaller ecosystem than GitLab
- ✕ Actions less mature than GitHub Actions
- ✕ Limited project management
Woodpecker CI anti-patterns
- ✕ Smaller plugin ecosystem
- ✕ Less documentation than Jenkins
- ✕ Fewer enterprise features