Keycloak vs SuperTokens

Keycloak

Open-source IAM and SSO platform

SuperTokens

Open-source authentication for web and mobile apps

Feature Keycloak SuperTokens
Category Security & Auth Security & Auth
Sub-category Identity Provider Auth Library
Maturity stable stable
Complexity intermediate intermediate
Performance tier medium medium
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
License type permissive permissive
Pricing fully free fully free
GitHub stars 24.0K 14.0K
Contributors 0 0
Commit frequency weekly weekly
Plugin ecosystem none none
Docs quality good good
Backing org Red Hat / CNCF SuperTokens
Funding model corporate open_core
Min RAM 1 GB 512 MB
Min CPU cores 1 1
Scaling pattern single_node single_node
Self-hostable Yes Yes
K8s native No No
Offline capable No No
Vendor lock-in none none
Languages Java Java, Node.js
API type REST REST
Protocols HTTP HTTP
Deployment docker docker
SDK languages — —
Team size fit solo, small, medium, enterprise small, medium
First release 2020 2020
Latest version — —

When to use Keycloak

  • ✓ Primary: single-sign-on
  • ✓ Primary: identity-management
  • ✓ Primary: user-authentication

When to use SuperTokens

  • ✓ Drop-in authentication for web/mobile apps
  • ✓ Social login with email/phone verification
  • ✓ Multi-tenant SaaS authentication

Keycloak anti-patterns

SuperTokens anti-patterns

  • ✕ Core in Java — some prefer lightweight solutions
  • ✕ Self-hosted needs separate PostgreSQL/MySQL
  • ✕ Less feature-rich IAM than Keycloak
Full Keycloak profile → Full SuperTokens profile → All comparisons