Keycloak vs SuperTokens

Keycloak

Open-source IAM and SSO platform

SuperTokens

Open-source authentication for web and mobile apps

Feature Keycloak SuperTokens
Category Security & Auth Security & Auth
Sub-category Identity Provider Auth Library
Maturity stable stable
Complexity intermediate intermediate
Performance tier medium medium
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
License type permissive permissive
Pricing fully free fully free
GitHub stars 24.0K 14.0K
Contributors 0 0
Commit frequency weekly weekly
Plugin ecosystem none none
Docs quality good good
Backing org Red Hat / CNCF SuperTokens
Funding model corporate open_core
Min RAM 1 GB 512 MB
Min CPU cores 1 1
Scaling pattern single_node single_node
Self-hostable Yes Yes
K8s native No No
Offline capable No No
Vendor lock-in none none
Languages Java Java, Node.js
API type REST REST
Protocols HTTP HTTP
Deployment docker docker
SDK languages
Team size fit solo, small, medium, enterprise small, medium
First release 2020 2020
Latest version

When to use Keycloak

  • Primary: single-sign-on
  • Primary: identity-management
  • Primary: user-authentication

When to use SuperTokens

  • Drop-in authentication for web/mobile apps
  • Social login with email/phone verification
  • Multi-tenant SaaS authentication

Keycloak anti-patterns

SuperTokens anti-patterns

  • Core in Java — some prefer lightweight solutions
  • Self-hosted needs separate PostgreSQL/MySQL
  • Less feature-rich IAM than Keycloak
Full Keycloak profile → Full SuperTokens profile → All comparisons