Lucia vs SuperTokens

Lucia

Lightweight authentication library for TypeScript

SuperTokens

Open-source authentication for web and mobile apps

Feature Lucia SuperTokens
Category Embeddable Security & Auth
Sub-category Auth Library Auth Library
Maturity stable stable
Complexity intermediate intermediate
Performance tier medium medium
License MIT Apache-2.0
License type permissive permissive
Pricing fully free fully free
GitHub stars 10.0K 14.0K
Contributors 100 0
Commit frequency weekly weekly
Plugin ecosystem none none
Docs quality good good
Backing org pilcrow SuperTokens
Funding model community open_core
Min RAM 16 MB 512 MB
Min CPU cores 1 1
Scaling pattern single_node single_node
Self-hostable Yes Yes
K8s native No No
Offline capable No No
Vendor lock-in none none
Languages TypeScript Java, Node.js
API type SDK REST
Protocols HTTP HTTP
Deployment npm docker
SDK languages typescript, javascript —
Team size fit solo, small, medium small, medium
First release 2022 2020
Latest version — —

When to use Lucia

  • ✓ Add authentication to TypeScript apps
  • ✓ Session management without heavy frameworks
  • ✓ Auth for Next.js/SvelteKit/Astro apps

When to use SuperTokens

  • ✓ Drop-in authentication for web/mobile apps
  • ✓ Social login with email/phone verification
  • ✓ Multi-tenant SaaS authentication

Lucia anti-patterns

  • ✕ No UI components
  • ✕ Requires understanding of auth concepts
  • ✕ Less batteries-included than SuperTokens

SuperTokens anti-patterns

  • ✕ Core in Java — some prefer lightweight solutions
  • ✕ Self-hosted needs separate PostgreSQL/MySQL
  • ✕ Less feature-rich IAM than Keycloak
Full Lucia profile → Full SuperTokens profile → All comparisons