Lucia vs SuperTokens

Lucia

Lightweight authentication library for TypeScript

SuperTokens

Open-source authentication for web and mobile apps

Feature Lucia SuperTokens
Category Embeddable Security & Auth
Sub-category Auth Library Auth Library
Maturity stable stable
Complexity intermediate intermediate
Performance tier medium medium
License MIT Apache-2.0
License type permissive permissive
Pricing fully free fully free
GitHub stars 10.0K 14.0K
Contributors 100 0
Commit frequency weekly weekly
Plugin ecosystem none none
Docs quality good good
Backing org pilcrow SuperTokens
Funding model community open_core
Min RAM 16 MB 512 MB
Min CPU cores 1 1
Scaling pattern single_node single_node
Self-hostable Yes Yes
K8s native No No
Offline capable No No
Vendor lock-in none none
Languages TypeScript Java, Node.js
API type SDK REST
Protocols HTTP HTTP
Deployment npm docker
SDK languages typescript, javascript
Team size fit solo, small, medium small, medium
First release 2022 2020
Latest version

When to use Lucia

  • Add authentication to TypeScript apps
  • Session management without heavy frameworks
  • Auth for Next.js/SvelteKit/Astro apps

When to use SuperTokens

  • Drop-in authentication for web/mobile apps
  • Social login with email/phone verification
  • Multi-tenant SaaS authentication

Lucia anti-patterns

  • No UI components
  • Requires understanding of auth concepts
  • Less batteries-included than SuperTokens

SuperTokens anti-patterns

  • Core in Java — some prefer lightweight solutions
  • Self-hosted needs separate PostgreSQL/MySQL
  • Less feature-rich IAM than Keycloak
Full Lucia profile → Full SuperTokens profile → All comparisons