n8n vs Node-RED

n8n

Fair-code workflow automation with 400+ integrations

Node-RED

Flow-based programming for IoT and APIs

Feature n8n Node-RED
Category Automation Automation
Sub-category Workflow Workflow
Maturity stable stable
Complexity intermediate intermediate
Performance tier medium medium
License Sustainable Use Apache-2.0
License type fair-code permissive
Pricing fully free fully free
GitHub stars 55.0K 20.0K
Contributors 0 0
Commit frequency weekly weekly
Plugin ecosystem none none
Docs quality good good
Backing org n8n GmbH OpenJS Foundation
Funding model vc_backed foundation
Min RAM 512 MB 256 MB
Min CPU cores 1 1
Scaling pattern single_node single_node
Self-hostable Yes Yes
K8s native No No
Offline capable No No
Vendor lock-in none none
Languages TypeScript Node.js
API type REST REST
Protocols HTTP HTTP
Deployment docker, npm docker, npm
SDK languages — —
Team size fit solo, small, medium, enterprise solo, small, medium, enterprise
First release 2020 2020
Latest version — —

When to use n8n

  • ✓ Primary: api-integration
  • ✓ Primary: business-process-automation
  • ✓ Primary: ai-workflow-building

When to use Node-RED

  • ✓ Primary: iot-automation
  • ✓ Primary: home-automation
  • ✓ Primary: api-integration

n8n anti-patterns

  • ✕ Fair-code license restricts some commercial use
  • ✕ Complex workflows can be hard to debug
  • ✕ Self-hosting needs maintenance

Node-RED anti-patterns

  • ✕ Not designed for enterprise workflows
  • ✕ Limited error handling
  • ✕ UI less polished for business users
Full n8n profile → Full Node-RED profile → All comparisons