PocketBase vs Supabase

PocketBase

Backend in a single file with admin UI

Supabase

Open-source Firebase alternative on PostgreSQL

Feature PocketBase Supabase
Category Low-Code Low-Code
Sub-category Backend-as-Service Backend-as-Service
Maturity stable stable
Complexity beginner beginner
Performance tier medium medium
License MIT Apache-2.0
License type permissive permissive
Pricing fully free fully free
GitHub stars 44.0K 78.0K
Contributors 0 0
Commit frequency weekly weekly
Plugin ecosystem none none
Docs quality good good
Backing org PocketBase Supabase
Funding model community vc_backed
Min RAM 128 MB 1 GB
Min CPU cores 1 1
Scaling pattern single_node single_node
Self-hostable Yes Yes
K8s native No No
Offline capable No No
Vendor lock-in none none
Languages Go TypeScript
API type REST REST
Protocols HTTP HTTP
Deployment docker docker
SDK languages — —
Team size fit solo, small, medium solo, small, medium
First release 2020 2020
Latest version — —

When to use PocketBase

  • ✓ Primary: rapid-prototyping-backend
  • ✓ Primary: small-app-backend
  • ✓ Primary: auth-and-storage

When to use Supabase

  • ✓ Primary: backend-as-service
  • ✓ Primary: authentication
  • ✓ Primary: realtime-subscriptions

PocketBase anti-patterns

  • ✕ SQLite limits concurrent writes
  • ✕ Not for large-scale production
  • ✕ Single-binary means single-node

Supabase anti-patterns

  • ✕ PostgreSQL dependency
  • ✕ Edge functions limited vs full serverless
  • ✕ Self-hosting complex
Full PocketBase profile → Full Supabase profile → All comparisons