PocketBase vs Supabase

PocketBase

Backend in a single file with admin UI

Supabase

Open-source Firebase alternative on PostgreSQL

Feature PocketBase Supabase
Category Low-Code Low-Code
Sub-category Backend-as-Service Backend-as-Service
Maturity stable stable
Complexity beginner beginner
Performance tier medium medium
License MIT Apache-2.0
License type permissive permissive
Pricing fully free fully free
GitHub stars 44.0K 78.0K
Contributors 0 0
Commit frequency weekly weekly
Plugin ecosystem none none
Docs quality good good
Backing org PocketBase Supabase
Funding model community vc_backed
Min RAM 128 MB 1 GB
Min CPU cores 1 1
Scaling pattern single_node single_node
Self-hostable Yes Yes
K8s native No No
Offline capable No No
Vendor lock-in none none
Languages Go TypeScript
API type REST REST
Protocols HTTP HTTP
Deployment docker docker
SDK languages
Team size fit solo, small, medium solo, small, medium
First release 2020 2020
Latest version

When to use PocketBase

  • Primary: rapid-prototyping-backend
  • Primary: small-app-backend
  • Primary: auth-and-storage

When to use Supabase

  • Primary: backend-as-service
  • Primary: authentication
  • Primary: realtime-subscriptions

PocketBase anti-patterns

  • SQLite limits concurrent writes
  • Not for large-scale production
  • Single-binary means single-node

Supabase anti-patterns

  • PostgreSQL dependency
  • Edge functions limited vs full serverless
  • Self-hosting complex
Full PocketBase profile → Full Supabase profile → All comparisons