Chatwoot vs Zammad

Chatwoot

Open-source customer engagement platform with live chat widget

Zammad

Full-featured helpdesk and ticketing system with live chat

Feature Chatwoot Zammad
Category Embeddable Embeddable
Sub-category Live Chat Helpdesk
Maturity stable mature
Complexity intermediate intermediate
Performance tier medium medium
License MIT AGPL-3.0
License type permissive copyleft
Pricing fully free fully free
GitHub stars 22.0K 5.0K
Contributors 500 100
Commit frequency weekly weekly
Plugin ecosystem medium none
Docs quality good good
Backing org Chatwoot Zammad Foundation
Funding model vc_backed foundation
Min RAM 2 GB 2 GB
Min CPU cores 1 1
Scaling pattern single_node single_node
Self-hostable Yes Yes
K8s native No No
Offline capable No No
Vendor lock-in none none
Languages Ruby, Vue Ruby
API type REST, WebSocket SDK
Protocols HTTP HTTP
Deployment docker docker
SDK languages javascript, ruby
Team size fit small, medium, enterprise small, medium, enterprise
First release 2019 2016
Latest version

When to use Chatwoot

  • Embed live chat widget on any website
  • Omnichannel support across email/social/WhatsApp
  • AI-powered customer support with Captain agent
  • Team inbox for customer conversations

When to use Zammad

  • Enterprise helpdesk with ticket management
  • Multi-channel customer support
  • Knowledge base for self-service

Chatwoot anti-patterns

  • Ruby on Rails — heavier stack
  • Self-hosting needs Redis + PostgreSQL + Sidekiq
  • Enterprise features in paid cloud

Zammad anti-patterns

  • AGPL license
  • Heavier than pure chat solutions
  • German-origin — some docs incomplete in English
Full Chatwoot profile → Full Zammad profile → All comparisons